With passage of California’s 33% renewable energy law (RPS) in 2011, the state’s publicly owned utilities were obligated to meet the same renewable requirements at the major investor-owned utilities (PG&E, SCE and SDG&E) for the first time. That’s no small step forward for renewables in the state! Together the state’s 10 largest publicly owned utilities deliver approximately one-quarter of all the state’s electricity needs.
Our friends over at the Union of Concerned Scientists released a new report today that ranks those 10 publicly owned utilities on their clean energy progress, and we’re not entirely surprised to see that the biggest — Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — did not earn top marks.
LADWP falls in the middle of the pack on clean energy, below the likes of Silicon Valley Power and Modesto Irrigation District but above others like Burbank Water and Power. UCS notes that while LADWP achieved 20% renewables in 2010, nearly one third of that clean power came from short-term contracts of five years or less, which don’t provide the investment certainty needed to finance and build new clean power plants. Add to that LADWP’s lackluster record on solar: less than one half of one percent of Angelenos’ power mix comes from solar, and LA has far less rooftop solar per capita than the two other biggest utilities in the state, PG&E and Southern California Edison.
In a city as eco-loving and sunny as LA, so much more clean energy leadership is possible! And Angelenos think so too. LADWP and LA City leaders have made new strides on solar recently, restarting the Solar Incentive Program for self-generation and launching a feed-in tariff program for up to 150 megawatts of wholesale projects. Just today, the utility announced it had no less than 26 applications in its first request for feed-in tariff proposals, and plans to sign the first round of contracts by November.
We’d like to see City leaders keep building on that momentum and get up to speed with the rest of this increasingly solar-powered state. It’s time for LA to break its dirty coal dependence and boost the local economy by investing in lots of new rooftop solar. There’s nothing like bringing home a report card marked “Most Improved!”
Why is there a limit on the energy that can be provided by individual solar? Why should PG&E have the right to purchase expensive natural gas, and even, in some cases, COAL(!), when the ability to generate electricity is on the rooftops of every home in every location in California? Why the limitation?
Also, why can’t our meters run backward beyond our personal use and PG&E pay us, its constituents, as New Jersy does? As citizens we wouldn’t feel we had to hate our PUBLIC utilities if we felt we were working hand in hand, rather than being screwed by them!
Also, Los angeles has the greatest potential, why aren’t all businesses and schools with roof top sizes of a measured amount, required to install solar photovoltaics or pay a comensurate tax rather than be Limited by LAWP? What is a PUBLIC UTILITY?