Update on SDG&E’s special charge for solar customers

January 27th, 2012
0 Comments - Add Yours »

Remember that special charge that SDG&E wanted to impose only on people that invested in solar? The one that would have made it much harder to go solar? (Here was our take and here was CCSE’s)

Many parties (including Vote Solar) intervened, arguing it was not only bad for solar and bad for San Diego, but also illegal.  On January 18, CPUC Commissioner Ferron issued a ruling (pdf) agreeing that the proposed charge is inappropriate, and required SDG&E to refile their ratecase without it.

Big win.  Special thanks to UCAN, and of course to Commissioner Ferron.

, Category: Solar trends

New life to PACE

January 27th, 2012
0 Comments - Add Yours »

News in the ongoing effort to restore PACE, the promising clean energy financing program that ran into hurdles put up by FHFA.

» Read the rest of this entry «

California’s top ten solar cities

January 25th, 2012
0 Comments - Add Yours »

Credit: Environment CA

This morning our friends at Environment California released a new report ranking California cities by the amount of solar they’ve installed. The good news?

“From Fresno to San Francisco and Clovis to Culver City, solar power is becoming a mainstream technology throughout California,” said Michelle Kinman, clean energy advocate with Environment California Research & Policy Center and co-author of the report. “Solar power is booming in California and with the right leadership we can continue to benefit from the cleaner air and local jobs that this industry inevitably brings.” » Read the rest of this entry «

Our New Year’s Resolution: Protecting solar self-generation

January 9th, 2012
0 Comments - Add Yours »

It may not sound all that snazzy, but electricity rate design is one of the hottest topics in the solar industry right now. Because so much of a solar energy system’s value comes from the bill payments it is offsetting, exactly how utilities charge a customer for power can mean the difference between a good return on that solar investment – or not. As a result, this rather arcane and hugely complicated rate design process is critical to the continued success of customer solar adoption. So you can bet Vote Solar is working hard to establish and defend solar-friendly electricity rates in states from coast to coast.

Recently that’s meant protecting solar energy users from unfair fees on their electricity bills in San Diego, California.

» Read the rest of this entry «

Governor Cuomo Gets Serious about Solar

January 5th, 2012
3 Comments - Add Yours »

Yesterday New York Governor Cuomo outlined his priorities for the year ahead in his State of the State address. Among his top initiatives for a building a better New York? More solar!

Touting the state’s successful development of other renewable resources, Cuomo remarked that,

“Now it is time to focus more attention on exploiting our solar potential.”

With rising electricity needs, plenty of sunshine, and a local workforce primed for solar jobs, that potential is tremendous indeed. To harness it, the Governor suggests increasing large, commercial solar projects while also supporting small and medium residential and commercial systems. With an emphasis on much needed job growth, Cuomo has set his sights on quadrupling NY solar capacity by 2013 and beyond. And along with those leaders from the business community, environmental advocates and organized labor, Vote Solar stood up and applauded the Governor’s solar vision.

The Governor’s proposal directly in line with the early years of the solar growth path included as part of last year’s New York Power Act. Passed by the legislature and signed by Cuomo himself, that legislation included a cost-benefit study for a more aggressive 5,000 megawatts of solar. (The results of that study are due out later this month, so stay tuned).

The New York Solar Jobs Act would make good on that promise, providing the necessary blueprint for 5,000 MW of solar development of all sized by 2026. In doing so it would stimulate immediate investment in solar jobs and infrastructure and lay the foundation for long-term solar leadership. Building a solar market that is comprehensive, robust and stable will mean quality jobs, clean air, reliable electricity and a bright economic future for generations of New Yorkers.

First the 5,000 MW study. Now the State of the State. It’s clear that New York plans to make a solar move in 2012. Let’s make that move worthy of the Empire State.

December 2011: record month for California rooftop solar

January 4th, 2012
0 Comments - Add Yours »

For some, December probably meant eggnogs, football, relatives, etc.  For the California solar industry, it meant a record month of rooftop, behind-the-meter solar.  There were over 36 MW of customer-owned installations–the highest since the California Solar Initiative’s inception, and over 130 MW worth of incentive applications.  Details on the California Solar Statistics site, here.

This is all the more remarkable, since residential solar incentives have been reduced (as scheduled) from $4.50/W to between 25 cents and 35 cents/W.  And the non-residential incentives are 4.4 cents/kWh of generation, for 5 years (equivalent to a 5-year, 4.4 cent/kWh SREC contract).

Note that this does not include all the wholesale solar installations (RPS/RAM/FIT).

Sure beats rumcake.

 

In Arizona, an unfair surcharge for customers who go solar

December 20th, 2011
0 Comments - Add Yours »

Regulators at the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) put their stamp of approval late last week on a new surcharge unfairly penalizing customers that go solar. The state’s utilities charge customers a monthly fee to help pay for solar-panel rebates and to purchase clean energy to meet the state’s 15% by 2025 renewable energy standard. Until now, those fees were charged based on a customer’s energy use—if you use more power, you pay more of a fee—so that when customers went solar and started feeding a lot of excess clean energy back to the grid via net metering, they would pay less in renewable energy fees. That framework makes sense given that solar customers have already paid thousands of their own dollars to install solar arrays, and are reducing the grid’s need for things like transmission and distribution lines. » Read the rest of this entry «

No Pumpkin Time for California’s Renewable Energy/RD&D

December 19th, 2011
0 Comments - Add Yours »

On December 15th, during the last 2011 meeting (stroke of midnight-esque) of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), by unanimous vote the five CPUC Commissioners approved a proposed decision keeping approximately $250 million of renewable energy and research, development and demonstration (RD&D) funding alive. 

See http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/published/agenda/docs/3286_results.pdf for the full CPUC decision.

This clean-energy-mission-critical funding was set to expire January 1, 2012 (pumpkin time), but thanks to the joint advocacy of The Vote Solar Initiative, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Union of Concerned Scientists, Sierra Club CA, The Nature Conservancy and Californians for Clean Energy and Jobs (commonly known as “The Joint Environmental Parties” or, perhaps, “fairy godmothers”?), vital clean energy related programs, policies and practices will remain intact. 

At least for the time being (not quite to the happy ending). 

» Read the rest of this entry «

LA’s public utility plans new strides on solar

December 16th, 2011
1 Comment - Add Yours »

Vote Solar staff attended meetings this week with staff of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), the nation’s largest publicly-owned utility, serving about 10% of California’s electrical load. California law now requires munis like LADWP to get 33% of their power mix from renewables by 2020, prompting a big increase from LADWP’s current 20 percent. The utility’s Board of Commissioners officially adopted a program for getting to 33% renewables recently, but staff noted that many of the important decisions will actually get made in the utility’s 2012 Integrated Resource Planning process.

Via the IRP, the utility will analyze a range of different 20-year planning scenarios, choose one of those scenarios as its preferred long-term plan for serving its customers, and request rate increases from the LA City Council as needed to allow funding for that path. LADWP currently gets only 1% of its renewables from solar  (wind and small hydro forms the bulk of its clean energy portfolio), but staff indicated a plan to ramp up investment in utility-scale solar considerably, given solar’s ability to locate in urban areas and to provide generation at times of highest demand.  In the new year, Vote Solar will work to highlight the value of solar where the rubber meets the road in LADWP’s IRP process.

In other recent LA news, the LA Business Council recently released a report showing that LADWP lags behind most other California utilities on distributed solar – for example, Southern California Edison has more than six times as much distributed solar installed per customer as LADWP. The utility made a step in the right direction this week, however, presenting a plan to implement a 75 MW feed-in tariff program by the end of 2013 and a 150 MW program by 2016, assuming it can get the necessary funding from City Council.  We think the utility should move beyond that 150 MW goal, installing at least 600 MW of distributed solar in the next ten years, at the same time creating a valuable new engine for jobs.

Best. Quarter. Ever. Let’s make sure its not the last.

December 16th, 2011
0 Comments - Add Yours »

Take Action

The story of American solar power has been one of stunning success by just about any metric. Just yesterday, SEIA reported that the industry had a whopper of a third quarter: 449 megawatts of new solar capacity was installed in just 3 months! That’s the best quarter ever for U.S. solar. It brought us to more than 1,000 MW already installed in 2011 – the scale of a couple of coal power plants – with strong growth expected to continue in this last part of the year.

But this growing piece of our national economy is also experiencing unprecedented political uncertainty. Take the case of the highly successful 1603 Treasury Grant Program, set to expire at the end of the year (Do you ever get deja vu?). Simply extending the existing program would provide the firm policy footing needed to help keep American solar growth on track – and yet it’s highly unclear whether Congress will act in time. Can you help speak up in support? » Read the rest of this entry «

, Category: Federal updates